Botanical species · safety record

Anethum graveolens

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 35 constituent measurements, 1 adverse-effect record and 2 genotoxicity assays for Anethum graveolens. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Anethum graveolens L.

35Constituent measurements
3Safety records
13Cited sources
24Licensed products (Canada)

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 24 licensed products naming Anethum graveolens as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Extract types on licence

  • Dry

Source material stated

  • Dill Seeds
  • Fruit
  • Grain(s)
  • Herb
  • Herb top
  • Leaf
  • New material
  • Seed

What the records describe

Constituents measured

  • Carvone12
  • Dillapiole5
  • Dihydrocarvone3
  • Myristicin3
  • Umbelliferone3
  • Coumarins2
  • Scopoletin2
  • (+)-pulegone1
  • Bergapten1
  • Esculetin1

Plant parts

  • Seed16
  • Fruit unspecified12
  • Aerial part of plants6
  • Leaves2

Preparations

  • Solvent extraction23
  • Essential oil13

Effect types

  • Reproductive1

Target tissues

  • Urogenital1

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

SubstancePlant partPreparationConcentrationAnalytical methodSource
(+)-pulegoneAerial part of plantsSolvent extraction6.67 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneAerial part of plantsSolvent extraction16.2 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneFruit unspecifiedEssential oil22 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneSeedSolvent extraction≥ 45.84 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneSeedSolvent extraction≤ 48.15 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneFruit unspecifiedEssential oil66.6 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
CarvoneSeedSolvent extraction≥ 0.032 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
CarvoneSeedSolvent extraction≤ 0.072 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
CarvoneSeedEssential oil58.11 PercentUnspecifiedResolve DOI
CarvoneAerial part of plantsEssential oil6.66 PercentUnspecifiedResolve DOI
CoumarinsLeavesSolvent extraction≥ 1.3 Microgram/millilitreHigh Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)Resolve DOI
CoumarinsLeavesSolvent extraction≤ 9.5 Microgram/millilitreHigh Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)Resolve DOI
DihydrocarvoneAerial part of plantsSolvent extraction1.03 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
DihydrocarvoneFruit unspecifiedEssential oil≥ 1.3 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
DihydrocarvoneFruit unspecifiedEssential oil≤ 2.1 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
DillapioleFruit unspecifiedEssential oil26.8 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
DillapioleAerial part of plantsSolvent extraction6.66 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
L-piperitoneFruit unspecifiedEssential oil8.2 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
MyristicinFruit unspecifiedEssential oil3.2 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
MyristicinSeedSolvent extraction≥ 0.015 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
MyristicinSeedSolvent extraction≤ 0.042 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
UmbelliferoneSeedSolvent extraction≥ 0.002 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
UmbelliferoneSeedSolvent extraction≤ 0.007 PercentGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)Resolve DOI
BergaptenFruit unspecifiedSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier
CarvoneSeedEssential oil≥ 36.53 PercentGC-MSNo resolvable identifier
CarvoneSeedEssential oil≤ 81.15 PercentGC-MSNo resolvable identifier
CarvoneSeedSolvent extraction7.07 Nanogram/gramGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)No resolvable identifier
DillapioleSeedEssential oil≥ 0.02 PercentGC-MSNo resolvable identifier
DillapioleSeedEssential oil≤ 6.3 PercentGC-MSNo resolvable identifier
DillapioleSeedSolvent extraction5.87 Nanogram/gramGelpermeation, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)No resolvable identifier
EsculetinFruit unspecifiedSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier
ScopoletinAerial part of plantsSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier
ScopoletinFruit unspecifiedSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier
UmbelliferoneFruit unspecifiedSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier
UmbellipreninFruit unspecifiedSolvent extraction—Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)No resolvable identifier

Recorded adverse effects

Adverse effects reported in the source literature, most often in animal or laboratory models at a stated preparation and dose.

EffectTarget tissuePlant partPreparationTest organismTest typeSource
ReproductiveUrogenitalSeedSolvent extractionRat (as animal)Reproduction toxicityResolve DOI

Genotoxicity testing

Outcomes of genotoxicity assays as recorded in the source. A negative assay is a result under those test conditions, not a clearance.

OutcomeEndpointTestTested organismMetabolic activationSource
Positive—somatic mutation assay in DrosophilaDrosophila melanogaster (as animal)—Resolve DOI
Positivegene mutationbacterial reverse mutation assayBacteria (as organism)With and withoutResolve DOI

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

  1. Abudayyak, Mahmoud., Ozdemir Nath, Ebru., Ozhan, Gul. Toxic potentials of ten herbs commonly used for aphrodisiac effect in Turkey. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, vol. 45, no. 3, p. 496-506. DOI
  2. Lazutka, JR., Mierauskiene, J., Slapsyte, G., Dedonyte, V. Genotoxicity of dill (Anethum graveolens L.), peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) essential oils in human lymphocytes and Drosophila melanogaster . Food and chemical toxicology, 2001, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 485-492. DOI
  3. Malihezaman, Monsefi., Mojaba, Masoudi., Elham, Hosseini., Farnaz, Gramifar., Ramin, Miri. ANTI-FERTILITY EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT FRACTIONS OF ANETHUM GRAVEOLENS L. EXTRACTS ON FEMALE RATS . African journal of traditional complementary and alternative medicines, 2012, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 336-341. DOI
  4. Baslas, B. K., Baslas, R. K. Chemistry of the oil from the herb Anethum graveolens. Riechstoffe, aromen, koerperpflegemittel, 1972, vol. 22, no. 5), 155-, p. 158.
  5. Amanpour, Asghar., Kelebek, Hasim., Selli, Serkan. Aroma constituents of shade-dried aerial parts of Iranian dill (Anethum graveolens L.) and savory (Satureja sahendica Bornm.) by solvent-assisted flavor evaporation technique . Journal of food measurement and characterization, 2017, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 1430-1439. DOI
  6. Mahran, G.H., Kadry, H.A., Thabet, C.K., El-Olemy, M.M., Al-Azizi, M.M., Schiff, P.L., Wong, L.K., Liv, N. GC/MS analysis of volatile oil of fruits of anethum graveolens. Pharmaceutical biology, 1992, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 139-144. DOI
  7. Wang, XS., Kapoor, V., Smythe, GA. Extraction and chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis of the active principles from selected Chinese herbs and other medicinal plants. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2003, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 927-944. DOI
  8. Sousa, Rose Marie O. F., Rosa, Jose S., Oliveira, Luisa., Cunha, Ana., Fernandes-Ferreira, Manuel. Activities of Apiaceae essential oils and volatile compounds on hatchability, development, reproduction and nutrition of Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) . Industrial crops and products, 2015, vol. 63, p. 226-237. DOI
  9. Dhalwal, Kamlesh., Shinde, Vaibhav M., Mahadik, Kakasaheb R. Efficient and sensitive method for quantitative determination and validation of umbelliferone, carvone and myristicin in Anethum graveolens and Carum carvi seed . Chromatographia, 2008, vol. 67, no. 1-2, p. 163-167. DOI
  10. Alam, P., Alqasoumi, S.I., Abdel-Kader, S.M.S., Abdel-Kader, M.S. Densitometric HPTLC methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis of carvone, dillapiole, methylparaben and propylparaben in dill, caraway seeds and pharmaceutical formulations utilizing normal and reversed-phase silica gel plates. Fabad journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2013, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 33-48.
  11. Ojala, T., Vuorela, P., Kiviranta, J., Vuorela, H., Hiltunen, R. A bioassay using Artemia salina for detecting phototoxicity of plant coumarins . Planta medica, 1999, vol. 65, no. 8, p. 715-718. DOI
  12. Ortan, Alina., Popescu, Maria-Lidia., Gaita, Andreea-Liana., Dinu-Pirvu, Cristina., Campeanu, Gh. Contributions to the Pharmacognostical Study on Anethum graveolens, Dill (Apiaceae) . Romanian biotechnological letters, 2009, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 4342-4348.
  13. Dranik, L. I., Prokopenko, A. P. Coumarins and acids from Anethum graveolens fruit. Khimiya prirodnykh soedinenii, 1969, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 437.

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue