Botanical species · safety record

Arctium lappa

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 3 constituent measurements and 3 adverse-effect records for Arctium lappa. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Arctium lappa L.

3Constituent measurements
3Safety records
4Cited sources
1,133Licensed products (Canada)

Also recorded as

Synonyms are carried from the source compendium. A species may be traded and studied under more than one name, which is exactly how a safety record gets lost.

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 1,133 licensed products naming Arctium lappa as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Extract types on licence

  • Dry
  • Extract Type TBA
  • Fresh
  • fluid
  • solid

Source material stated

  • Aged bark
  • Arctium lappa - root
  • Arctium lappa - fruit
  • Arctium lappa- root and rhizome
  • Bark and buds
  • Burdock Root Extract
  • Dried ripe fruit
  • Dried root(s)

What the records describe

Constituents measured

  • Arctigenin1
  • Arctiin1
  • Atropine1

Plant parts

  • Roots and other underground parts3
  • Fruit unspecified1
  • Leaves1
  • Live plants1

Preparations

  • Solvent extraction5

Effect types

  • Reproductive2
  • Neurotoxicity1

Target tissues

  • Uterus2
  • Neurologic: central nervous system1

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

SubstancePlant partPreparationConcentrationAnalytical methodSource
ArctigeninLive plantsSolvent extractionUnspecifiedResolve DOI
ArctiinFruit unspecifiedUnspecifiedResolve DOI
AtropineRoots and other underground partsSolvent extraction0.76 Milligram/gramGaschromatography (GC)Resolve DOI

Recorded adverse effects

Adverse effects reported in the source literature, most often in animal or laboratory models at a stated preparation and dose.

EffectTarget tissuePlant partPreparationTest organismTest typeSource
NeurotoxicityNeurologic: central nervous systemRoots and other underground partsSolvent extractionHuman (as organism)Case reportResolve DOI
ReproductiveUterusRoots and other underground partsSolvent extractionHuman (as organism)Reproduction toxicityNo resolvable identifier
ReproductiveUterusLeavesSolvent extractionHuman (as organism)Reproduction toxicityNo resolvable identifier

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

  1. Rhoads, P.M., Tong, T.G., Banner, W., Anderson, R. Anticholinergic poisonings associated with commercial burdock root tea. Clinical toxicology, 1984, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 581-584. DOI
  2. Shah, Ghulam Mujtaba., Khan, Mir Ajab., Ahmad, Mushtaq., Zafar, Muhammad., Khan, Aftab Ahmed. Observations on antifertility and abortifacient herbal drugs. African journal of biotechnology, 2009, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 1959-1964.
  3. Susanti, Siti., Iwasaki, Hironori., Itokazu, Yukiyoshi., Nago, Mariko., Taira, Naoyuki., Saitoh, Seikoh., Oku, Hirosuke. Tumor specific cytotoxicity of arctigenin isolated from herbal plant Arctium lappa L. . Journal of natural medicines, 2012, vol. 66, no. 4, p. 614-621. DOI
  4. Wu, Jian-Guo., Wu, Jin-Zhong., Sun, Lian-Na., Han, Ting., Du, Jian., Ye, Qi., Zhang, Hong., Zhang, Yu-Guang. Ameliorative effects of arctiin from Arctium lappa on experimental glomerulonephritis in rats . Phytomedicine, 2009, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1033-1041. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue