Botanical species · safety record

Coffea canephora

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 17 constituent measurements for Coffea canephora. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Coffea canephora Pierre ex A.Froehner

17Constituent measurements

0Safety records

5Cited sources

180Licensed products (Canada)

Also recorded as

Coffea robusta L.Liden

Synonyms are carried from the source compendium. A species may be traded and studied under more than one name, which is exactly how a safety record gets lost.

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 180 licensed products naming Coffea canephora as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Extract types on licence

Dry
Extract Type TBA
Fresh
solid

Source material stated

Bean
Bean (standardized extract)
Bean Extract
Coffea canephora - Seed
Decaffeinated green coffea canephora been extract
Fruit
Grain
New material

What the records describe

Constituents measured

Plant parts

Preparations

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

Substance	Plant part	Preparation	Concentration	Analytical method	Source
Caffeine	Fruit unspecified	—	≤ 31.7 Milliosmole	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Caffeine	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	19462.23 Milligram/litre	Chromatographic tests	Resolve DOI
Caffeine	Fruit unspecified	—	≥ 1.8 Milliosmole	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Daidzein	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≥ 17 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Daidzein	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≤ 26 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Formononetin	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≥ 17 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Formononetin	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≤ 52 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Genistein	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≤ 49 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Genistein	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	≥ 22 Percent	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Harman	Seed	Solvent extraction	≥ 3.07 Microgram/millilitre	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Harman	Seed	Solvent extraction	≤ 4.17 Microgram/millilitre	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Norharmane	Seed	Solvent extraction	≥ 9.04 Microgram/millilitre	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Norharmane	Seed	Solvent extraction	≤ 12.15 Microgram/millilitre	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Trigonelline	Fruit unspecified	—	≤ 36.5 Milliosmole	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Trigonelline	Fruit unspecified	—	≥ 0.42 Milliosmole	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Resolve DOI
Trigonelline	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	5226.01 Milligram/litre	Chromatographic tests	Resolve DOI
Furfural	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	19.9 Milligram/kilogram	High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/Liquid Chromatography (LC)	No resolvable identifier

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

Alves, R.C., Almeida, I.M.C., Casal, S., Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Isoflavones in coffee: influence of species, roast degree, and brewing method. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2010, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 3002-3007. DOI
Alves, Rita C., Casal, Susana., Oliveira, Beatriz P. P. Factors influencing the norharman and harman contents in espresso coffee. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2007, vol. 55, no. 5, p. 1832-1838. DOI
Chambel, P., Oliveira, M. B., Andrade, P. B., Seabra, R. M., Ferreira, M. A. Development of an HPLC/diode-array detector method for simultaneous determination of 5-HMF, furfural, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid and caffeine in coffee. Journal of liquid chromatography & related technologies, 1997, vol. 20, no. 18, p. 2949-2957.
Koshiro, Yukiko., Zheng, Xin-Qiang., Wang, Ming-Li., Nagai, Chifumi., Ashihara, Hiroshi. Changes in content and biosynthetic activity of caffeine and trigonelline during growth and ripening of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora fruits . Plant science, 2006, vol. 171, no. 2, p. 242-250. DOI
Caprioli, Giovanni., Cortese, Manuela., Maggi, Filippo., Minnetti, Caterina., Odello, Luigi., Sagratini, Gianni., Vittori, Sauro. Quantification of caffeine, trigonelline and nicotinic acid in espresso coffee: the influence of espresso machines and coffee cultivars . International journal of food sciences and nutrition, 2014, vol. 65, no. 4, p. 465-469. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue

Independent literature