Botanical species · safety record

Eucalyptus radiata

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 19 constituent measurements for Eucalyptus radiata. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Eucalyptus radiata A.Cunn. ex DC.

19Constituent measurements

0Safety records

9Cited sources

63Licensed products (Canada)

Also recorded as

Eucalyptus radiata Sieber ex DC. subsp. radiata

Synonyms are carried from the source compendium. A species may be traded and studied under more than one name, which is exactly how a safety record gets lost.

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 63 licensed products naming Eucalyptus radiata as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Source material stated

Leaf
New material
Plante entière

What the records describe

Constituents measured

Plant parts

Preparations

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

Substance	Plant part	Preparation	Concentration	Analytical method	Source
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	80.8 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	68.36 Percent/sample	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 4.6 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	72.25 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 0.4 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 64.5 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 2.5 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	82.3 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
L-piperitone	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 4.6 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
L-piperitone	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 1.05 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
L-piperitone	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 0.4 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
L-piperitone	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 48.09 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
Myrcene	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 1.1 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
Myrcene	Leaves	Essential oil	≥ 2.87 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
Myrcene	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 1.2 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
Myrcene	Leaves	Essential oil	≤ 3.19 Percent	GC-MS	Resolve DOI
1,8-cineole	Leaves	Essential oil	66.34 Percent	GC-MS	No resolvable identifier
1,8-cineole	Aerial part of plants	Essential oil	47.9 Percent	GC-MS	No resolvable identifier
Myrcene	Leaves	Essential oil	1.03 Percent	GC-MS	No resolvable identifier

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

Bignell, CM., Dunlop, PJ., Brophy, JJ. Volatile leaf oils of some south-western and southern Australian species of the genus Eucalyptus (Series 1). Part XIX . Flavour and fragrance journal, 1998, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 131-139. DOI
Chisowa, E.H. Chemical composition of essential oils of three eucalyptus species grown in Zambia. Journal of essential oil research, 1997, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 653-655. DOI
Juan, Laura W., Lucia, Alejandro., Zerba, Eduardo N., Harrand, Leonel., Marco, Martin., Masuh, Hector M. Chemical Composition and Fumigant Toxicity of the Essential Oils From 16 Species of Eucalyptus Against Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae) Adults . Journal of economic entomology, 2011, vol. 104, no. 3, p. 1087-1092. DOI
LI, H., MADDEN, JL., POTTS, BM. VARIATION IN VOLATILE LEAF OILS OF THE TASMANIAN EUCALYPTUS SPECIES .1. SUBGENUS MONOCALYPTUS . Biochemical systematics and ecology, 1995, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 299-318. DOI
Whiffin, T., Bouchier, A. Chemical and morphological variation within a population of eucalyptus radiata (Myrtaceae) exhibiting leaf volatile oil chemical forms. Australian systematic botany, 1992, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 95-107. DOI
Toudert-Taleb, K., Hedjal-Chebheb, M., Hami, H., Debras, J-F., Kellouche, A. Composition of essential oils extracted from six aromatic plants of Kabylian origin (Algeria) and evaluation of their bioactivity on Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius, 1775) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) . African entomology, 2014, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 417-427.
Yeom, Hwa-Jeong., Kang, Jaesoon., Kim, Sung-Woong., Park, Il-Kwon. Fumigant and contact toxicity of Myrtaceae plant essential oils and blends of their constituents against adults of German cockroach (Blattella germanica) and their acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity . Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2013, vol. 107, no. 2, p. 200-206. DOI
Faria, J.M.S., Lima, A.S., Mendes, M.D., Leiria, R., Geraldes, D.A., Figueiredo, A.C., Trindade, H., Pedro, L.G., Barroso, J.G., Sanches, J., Mathe A., Barata A.M., Carlen C., Craker L. Eucalyptus from Mata Experimental do Escaroupim (Portugal): Evaluation of the essential oil composition from sixteen species. Acta horticulturae, 2011, vol. 925, p. 61-66.
George, David R., Masic, Dino., Sparagano, Olivier A. E., Guy, Jonathan H. Variation in chemical composition and acaricidal activity against Dermanyssus gallinae of four eucalyptus essential oils. Experimental and applied acarology, 2009, vol. 48, no. 1-2, p. 43-50. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue

Independent literature