Botanical species · safety record

Kaempferia galanga

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 5 constituent measurements and 1 adverse-effect record for Kaempferia galanga. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Kaempferia galanga L.

5Constituent measurements
1Safety records
5Cited sources
9Licensed products (Canada)

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 9 licensed products naming Kaempferia galanga as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Extract types on licence

  • Dry

Source material stated

  • Rhizome
  • Whole plant

What the records describe

Constituents measured

  • 1,8-cineole3
  • Alkaloids1
  • Estragole1

Plant parts

  • Roots and other underground parts3
  • Roots and other underground parts used as staple food2
  • Unspecified1

Preparations

  • Essential oil4
  • Solvent extraction2

Effect types

  • Immunotoxicity1

Target tissues

  • Cardiovascular1
  • haematological: lymph nodes1

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

SubstancePlant partPreparationConcentrationAnalytical methodSource
1,8-cineoleRoots and other underground parts used as staple foodEssential oil≥ 0.19 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
1,8-cineoleRoots and other underground parts used as staple foodEssential oil≤ 5.17 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
EstragoleUnspecifiedEssential oil61.53 PercentUnspecifiedResolve DOI
1,8-cineoleRoots and other underground partsEssential oil2.4 PercentGC-MSNo resolvable identifier
AlkaloidsRoots and other underground partsSolvent extractionPhytochemical screeningNo resolvable identifier

Recorded adverse effects

Adverse effects reported in the source literature, most often in animal or laboratory models at a stated preparation and dose.

EffectTarget tissuePlant partPreparationTest organismTest typeSource
ImmunotoxicityCardiovascular / haematological: lymph nodesRoots and other underground partsSolvent extractionRat (as animal)Short-term toxicityResolve DOI

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

  1. Rajendra, C.E., Magadum, G.S., Nadaf, M.A., Yashoda, S.V., Manjula, M. Phytochemical screening of the rhizome of Kaempferia galanga. International journal of pharmacognosy and phytochemical research, 2011, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 61-63.
  2. Jirovetz, L., Buchbauer, G., Shafi, P.M., Abraham, G.T. Analysis of the essential oil of the roots of the medicinal plant Kaempferia galanga L. (Zingiberaceae) from South-India. Acta pharmaceutica turcica, 2001, vol. 43, no. 2, p. 107-110.
  3. Kanjanapothi, D., Panthong, A., Lertprasertsuke, N., Taesotikul, T., Rujjanawate, C., Kaewpinit, D., Sudthayakorn, R., Choochote, W., Chaithong, U., Jitpakdi, A., Pitasawat, B. Toxicity of crude rhizome extract of Kaempferia galanga L. (Proh Hom). Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2004, vol. 90, no. 2-3, p. 359-365. DOI
  4. Luo, J., Wu, D., Zhong, Y.-K. Analysis of volatile components of kaempferia galanga L. from guizhou by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Modern food science and technology, 2014, vol. 30, no. 12, p. 271-276. DOI
  5. Raina, Archana P., Abraham, Z., Sivaraj, N. Diversity analysis of Kaempferia galanga L. germplasm from South India using DIVA-GIS approach. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2015, vol. 69, p. 433-439. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue