Botanical species · safety record

Magnolia obovata

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 28 constituent measurements for Magnolia obovata. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Magnolia obovata Thunb.

28Constituent measurements

0Safety records

5Cited sources

0Licensed products (Canada)

Also recorded as

Magnolia glauca Thunb.

Synonyms are carried from the source compendium. A species may be traded and studied under more than one name, which is exactly how a safety record gets lost.

Regulatory presence

No Health Canada licensed natural health product in the snapshot names this species as a medicinal ingredient under this exact binomial. Absence here means absence from this one register under this one name, not absence from trade, and not a safety verdict.

What the records describe

Constituents measured

Plant parts

Preparations

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

Substance	Plant part	Preparation	Concentration	Analytical method	Source
Aporphine alkaloids	Leaves	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Aporphine alkaloids	Leaves	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Aporphine alkaloids	Leaves	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Aporphine alkaloids	Leaves	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Eleutheroside b	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.39 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Honokiol	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Honokiol	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.43 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Liriodendrin	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.15 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Magnolol	Bark	Solvent extraction	2.1 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Magnolol	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.26 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0031 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0031 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0044 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0061 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0056 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.0054 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.096 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.043 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.024 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Fruit unspecified	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	Resolve DOI
Neolignans	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.27 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Syringaresinol	Bark	Solvent extraction	0.029 Percent	HPLC with standard detection methods	Resolve DOI
Anonaine	Leaves	—	—	—	No resolvable identifier
Glaucine	Leaves	—	—	—	No resolvable identifier
Liriodenine	Leaves	—	—	—	No resolvable identifier
P-coumaric acid	Bark	Solvent extraction	—	Standard Chromatographic tests (paper- thin layer- and column chromatography)	No resolvable identifier
Roemerine	Leaves	—	—	—	No resolvable identifier

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

Ziyaev, R., Shtonda, N. I., Sturua, M. D., Abdusamatov, A., Tsakadze, D. M. Alkaloids of some Magnolia species. Chemistry of natural compounds (translation of khimiya prirodnykh soedinenii), 1999, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 366-367.
Matsuda, H., Kageura, T., Oda, M., Morikawa, T., Sakamoto, Y., Yoshikawa, M. Effects of constituents from the bark of Magnolia obovata on nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages . Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin, 2001, vol. 49, no. 6, p. 716-720. DOI
minbyeongseon., yunyijeong., baegihwan. Cytotoxic Compounds from the Stem Bark of Magnolia obovata. Natural product sciences, 2008, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 90-94.
Seo, Kyeong-Hwa., Lee, Dae-Young., Lee, Dong-Sung., Park, Ji-Hae., Jeong, Rak-Hun., Jung, Ye-Jin., Shrestha, Sabina., Chung, In-Sik., Kim, Geum-Soog., Kim, Youn-Chul., Baek, Nam-In. Neolignans from the Fruits of Magnolia obovata and Their Inhibition Effect on NO Production in LPS-Induced RAW264.7 Cells . Planta medica, 2013, vol. 79, no. 14, p. 1335-1340. DOI
Pyo, MK., Yun-Choi, HS., Hong, YJ. Antiplatelet activities of aporphine alkaloids isolated from leaves of Magnolia obovata . Planta medica, 2003, vol. 69, no. 3, p. 267-269. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue

Independent literature