Botanical species · safety record

Urtica dioica

The EFSA Compendium of Botanicals holds 8 constituent measurements, 1 adverse-effect record and 4 genotoxicity assays for Urtica dioica. This page reports what those source records contain and how to reach them. It carries no effect estimate, no dose and no recommendation.

Accepted name in source: Urtica dioica L.

8Constituent measurements
5Safety records
6Cited sources
1,203Licensed products (Canada)

Also recorded as

Synonyms are carried from the source compendium. A species may be traded and studied under more than one name, which is exactly how a safety record gets lost.

Regulatory presence

Health Canada's Licensed Natural Health Products Database holds 1,203 licensed products naming Urtica dioica as a medicinal ingredient, matched on the exact Latin binomial. A licence records that a product met the regulator's requirements for sale in Canada. It is not evidence that the product works.

Extract types on licence

  • Dry
  • Extract Type TBA
  • Fresh
  • decoction
  • fluid

Source material stated

  • Aerial (powder)
  • Aerial parts
  • Aerial parts extract
  • Beta-sitosterol
  • Dried leaf
  • Dried root(s)
  • Fresh Flowering Plant
  • Fresh flowering tops/aerial parts

What the records describe

Constituents measured

  • Alkaloids1
  • Anthraquinones1
  • Carvone1
  • Eugenol1
  • Furan derivatives1
  • Lectins1
  • Naphthalene1
  • Tannins1

Plant parts

  • Unspecified5
  • Aerial part of plants4

Preparations

  • Essential oil4
  • Solvent extraction1

Effect types

  • Digestive1

Target tissues

  • Digestive1

Recorded constituents

What analytical work has found in this species, at which plant part and preparation. A measured constituent is a fact about material, not about effect.

SubstancePlant partPreparationConcentrationAnalytical methodSource
AlkaloidsUnspecifiedPhytochemical screeningResolve DOI
AnthraquinonesUnspecifiedPhytochemical screeningResolve DOI
CarvoneAerial part of plantsEssential oil9 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
EugenolAerial part of plantsEssential oil1 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
Furan derivativesAerial part of plantsEssential oil1.4 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
LectinsUnspecifiedUnspecifiedResolve DOI
NaphthaleneAerial part of plantsEssential oil8.9 PercentGC-MSResolve DOI
TanninsUnspecifiedPhytochemical screeningResolve DOI

Recorded adverse effects

Adverse effects reported in the source literature, most often in animal or laboratory models at a stated preparation and dose.

EffectTarget tissuePlant partPreparationTest organismTest typeSource
DigestiveDigestiveUnspecifiedSolvent extractionIn vitroResolve DOI

Genotoxicity testing

Outcomes of genotoxicity assays as recorded in the source. A negative assay is a result under those test conditions, not a clearance.

OutcomeEndpointTestTested organismMetabolic activationSource
Positivegene mutationsomatic mutation assay in DrosophilaDrosophila melanogaster (as animal)Resolve DOI
PositiveDNA damage and/or repairsingle cell gel/comet assay in mammalian cells for detection of DNA damageHuman (as organism)Resolve DOI
Positivechromosome aberrationin vitro mammalian chromosome aberration testHuman (as organism)Resolve DOI
PositiveDNA damage and/or repairin vitro mammalian cell micronucleus testHuman (as organism)Resolve DOI

Cited sources

The literature the compendium cites for this species. Metatron Health has no relationship with these authors or journals and earns nothing from citing them.

  1. Basaran, AA., Yu, TW., Plewa, MJ., Anderson, D. An investigation of some turkish herbal medicines in Salmonella typhimurium and in the COMET assay in human lymphocytes. TERATOGENESIS CARCINOGENESIS AND MUTAGENESIS, 1996, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 125-138. DOI
  2. GRAF, U., MORAGA, AA., CASTRO, R., DIAZCARRILLO, E. GENOTOXICITY TESTING OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF BEVERAGES IN THE DROSOPHILA WING SOMATIC MUTATION AND RECOMBINATION TEST. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 423-430. DOI
  3. Gul, Suleyman., Demirci, Betul., Baser, Kemal Husnu Can., Akpulat, H. Askin., Aksu, Pinar. Chemical Composition and In Vitro Cytotoxic, Genotoxic Effects of Essential Oil from Urtica dioica L.. BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2012, vol. 88, no. 5, p. 666-671. DOI
  4. Khan, Amir Muhammad., Qureshi, Rizwana Aleem., Ullah, Faizan., Gilani, Syed Aneel., Nosheen, Asia., Sahreen, Sumaira., Laghari, Muhammad Khan., Laghari, Muhammad Yousif., Shafiq-Ur-Rehman., Hussain, Ishtiaq., Murad, Waheed. Phytochemical analysis of selected medicinal plants of Margalla Hills and surroundings. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL PLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, vol. 5, no. 25, p. 6017-6023. DOI
  5. Onal, S., Timur, S., Okutucu, B., Zihnioglu, F. Inhibition of alpha-glucosidase by aqueous extracts of some potent antidiabetic medicinal herbs . Preparative biochemistry & biotechnology, 2005, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 29-36. DOI
  6. Timoshenko, AV., Kayser, K., Kaltner, H., Andre, S., Gabius, HJ. Binding capacities of two immunomodulatory lectins, carrier-immobilized glycoligands and steroid hormones in Lung cancer and the concentration of nitrite nitrate in pleural effusions . Lung cancer, 1996, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 75-84. DOI

Boundary

A constituent measurement is a fact about material at a stated preparation, not a statement about what that material does in a person. An adverse-effect or genotoxicity record is an observation reported in a source, most often in an animal or laboratory model. Neither is a Metatron Health conclusion about causality, human risk or benefit, and the absence of a record is not proof that a preparation is safe. Nothing here is diagnosis, prescribing or individual medical care.

Continue